Talk:Geisha (coffee)
Add topic | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 August 2020 and 12 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): WoodJack212, Jmacarthur0417, MaddieDonnelly.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:36, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Title: from Esmeralda Gesha (no source for that) to Geisha coffee
[edit]{{help}} Can the title of this Wikipedia article be changed to "Geisha coffee"-- the word used in the only source: "One of the biggest stories of the last five years in the coffee industry is the discovery of a variety called Geisha," he says. Geisha was part of CATIE's collection of Ethiopian trees, in fact." http://www.mprnews.org/story/npr/178865467
Thank you. 208.44.84.138 (talk)
- Use the template at Wikipedia:Requested_moves#Requesting_a_single_page_move and pace on this page Ronhjones (Talk) 22:15, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
I've moved the page, as I agree with the suggestion. I also linked it to List_of_coffee_varieties and removed the orphan tag. I also tried to improve the article. I believe it is not part of the brands project as it is about the geisha variety and not the farm, although the farm plays a important role in its history. Leandromarco (talk) 17:44, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
I would like to get the tag "brand stub removed from this article. Considering this is the actual coffee. How do i complete this task?(WoodJack212 (talk) 20:59, 1 December 2020 (UTC)).
Title uses alternate name? Why?
[edit]The title of the article uses the spelling "Geisha" but the literal first clause of the article is: "Gesha coffee, sometimes referred to as Geisha coffee"
What are we doing here? Why is the title the "sometimes" spelling? Why do we call "geisha" the "sometimes" spelling if it really is prominent enough to be the title over the correct spelling? In my view, we should change the title to Gesha. Failing that, we should at least lead with the spelling used as the title of the article with an acknowledgement that "gesha" is likely considered more correct to the Ethiopians who originally grew this type of coffee, at least based on what we say in the rest of the article. Jebbikrebbi (talk) 20:25, 12 July 2026 (UTC)