Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related
Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
What is the purpose of [6], [7], [8] etc. in the text? They look like references to footnotes, but no corresponding notes are given. -- Picapica (talk) 22:53, 2 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
Footnotes seemed to be copy-pasted from the corresponding article in Dutch. Fixed them to link to the actual referenced sources.--Cinoreros (talk) 00:16, 14 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago7 comments2 people in discussion
@IvanScrooge98 Hi, I think the IPA should rather be [ˈɣeːrt burˈʑʋa], [t] because of the discussion we're having at Help:IPA/Dutch but also because the sound file makes a very clear break, and then short vowels for [burˈʑʋa] because it simply is pronounced like in French (with a different 'r'), at least in Belgium. Exarchus (talk) 18:06, 29 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
This just one of the many pages where I have amended the Dutch IPA in accordance with the help. Once we reach an agreement there we can adapt the linked transcriptions. ~ IvanScrooge98 (talk) 18:58, 29 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
My remark about the vowels is actually very specific for this page: if it's indicated as 'Flemish pronunciation' then it shouldn't have long vowels, whatever the general rules are. Exarchus (talk) 22:26, 29 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
The point still stands. At the moment the two labels are basically interchangeable since the help page does not differentiate between the two main variants and transcriptions may only change if Flemish uses a different diaphoneme from Netherlandic. ~ IvanScrooge98 (talk) 23:15, 29 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Then strictly speaking you might need two /u/ phonemes: one native lengthening before /r/, and a non-native phoneme not lengthening. And then a non-native /a/ phoneme, not the product of shortening of /aː/ in unstressed syllables. It would be useful to find a reference for this, but I'm not sure this is described somewhere. Exarchus (talk) 09:13, 30 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Maybe my remark about two /u/ phonemes is wrong as the /u/ might be regularly short in an unstressed syllable (see Gussenhoven p.344). But this (Netherlandic) pronounciation has long [uː], so I'm not sure here. Exarchus (talk) 09:49, 30 November 2024 (UTC)Reply