Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
Latest comment: 2 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I don't think Wikipedia should EVER say, of a person who died by TWO bullets, that it was suicide, unless it was videotaped. I would never say, as the condemnation above says, that "suicide is unlikely", but MAYBE it's unlikely. I don't know how likely or unlikely it might be. What I do know is that when Wikipedia allows it to be stated AS FACT that it is 100% certain to have been suicide, as if there were no debate on the matter, then Wikipedia is guilty of a moral wrongdoing and censorship. Maybe it was suicide. Maybe suicide is likely. Maybe it's unlikely. Saying that it was 100% sure to be a murder would be morally wrong too, a pretense, a lack of objectivity. But so is saying that it's a suicide. Wikipedia can be encyclopedic here ONLY by saying things like "officials ruled it a suicide" or "the case that it was a suicide is ..." and then detailing that case, and then saying immediately afterwards "Arguments against the suicide explanation include ..." and then detailing those too. Be objective. Be fair. Tell both sides. Don't tell people what facts to believe when those are not facts but are inferences incorrectly extracted from a set of facts that does NOT objectively justify a conclusion either way.~2026-14597-90 (talk) 00:49, 9 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
.svg)
_Gold_color.svg)
