Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2218276ae1a2c82

Jump to content

Talk:Garlic bread

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 months ago by Valereee in topic Presumptuous nonsense

Presumptuous nonsense

[edit]

Garlic bread can not be found in Italy, as Italian cuisine uses garlic parsimoniously and the bread at the table is usually eaten plain.

You can find garlic bread everywhere in Italy. Citation to this silly claim, please. Valgrus Thunderaxe (talk) 12:36, 15 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

It really is worded like bringing garlic and bread together is physically impossible there, even when it's stated 2 lines before that it's "an Italian-American dish". No idea why.
Unfortunately, I have no idea what a good source for what Italians do with garlic bread would be. The ones I found only really state that it's not too popular there, that Italians are more concerned with bruschetta, or that it "doesn't exist in real Italian cuisine". Maybe that's what the original writer meant to say, but just didn't word it properly. cogsan (talk) 13:49, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
wp:sofixit. Valereee (talk) 21:16, 27 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

the removal of the culture references

[edit]

In my opinion the culture references should be readded as they help to fill this rather short article with some helpful infos and I don't see any advantage of removing correct and helpful information, which already has been written. ApfelkuchenFisch (talk) 08:29, 26 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hey, @ApfelkuchenFisch! I don't see how any of those actually add to the reader's understanding of the article subject, and most of them had no references. Valereee (talk) 19:54, 26 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

removal of asexuality section

[edit]

Sourced to a blog, doesn't seem to add anything to a reader's understanding of the subject. Valereee (talk) 21:13, 27 March 2026 (UTC)Reply