Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a25ebfab18f6b1a9

Jump to content

Talk:Gardner Pinnacles

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Gardner Pinnacles/Comments)
Latest comment: 6 years ago by AbouMPSI in topic emphasis and Wikipedia Manual of Style

Others

[edit]

Gardiners_Island Gardiners_Bay Gardner_Island Nikumaroro

"San Diegan Bares Clue to Earhart Fate", by Lew Scarr, San Diego Tribune, July 21, 1960: "Gardner Island is a five-mile hyphen of coral punctuating a million square miles of nowhere and nothing in the Central Pacific. If a San Diego man is right, it is where Amelia Earhart crashed and died 23 years ago. The water slapping the short, sharp Gardner shoreline is as warm as your bath and as blue as your baby's eyes…" Hopiakuta 01:19, 12 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

No, Gardner Pinnacles is different. Gardner island, or Nikumaroro, is what that article is talking about. SeanMD80talk | contribs 12:26, 12 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Gardner Pinnacles/CommentsTalk:Gardner Pinnacles/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Needs to be broken up into sections. One section with info on geography/geology, one section for history (though by nature not as prolific as some of the other NWHI), on for ecology. SeanMD80talk | contribs 02:42, 23 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 02:42, 23 March 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 15:48, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

emphasis and Wikipedia Manual of Style

[edit]

Hello, There is no need for bold typeface - research papers and other short works instead take double quotation marks as per Wikipedia style rules - Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Emphasis. --AbouMPSI (talk) 17:28, 28 May 2020 (UTC)Reply