Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a237f1682c3ccf5e

Jump to content

Talk:Garage kit

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 years ago by 2404:2D00:5000:701:B9D2:5B05:FC57:BA04 in topic Japan section is a mess

wikifying

[edit]

Would anyone like to take on the task of getting the article up to wiki standards of quality? I currently don't have any pictures other then what could be found on the web, and i'm not sure what the copyright issues would be in this regard. Tani unit 02:47, 10 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

I have a coworker who is heavy into these kits. i will see if he will allow me to take some photos of some kits in both assembled and unassembled versions. thats about all the help i think i can offer with this one. what are the other quality issues with this one? Foxphyre 18:22, 12 December 2006 (UTC)Reply


ashley76

[edit]

I added a link to http://www.garagekits.us and it was taken down. This is a great site that not only expands on what garage kits are but, offers tutorials and more info on what is out there as far as kits go, and what the garage kit community is like...Ashley76 20:18, 30 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

I removed the link; the links on how to buy each kit made the link more like a store. As such, it doesn't pass WP:EL - the external link guidelines. The site looks nice, hopefully search engines rank it appropriately. --GargoyleMT 22:39, 30 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Japan section is a mess

[edit]

The Japan section starts with a statement that is highly prejudiced and misleadingly worded (18+ works at Wonder Festival count for maybe 10% of the entire event). It then rambles into "but it also has this, and some of this, and sometimes this" which is all vague. The statement on "dominant scales" is pure nonsense, as is "preferably with an airbrush". There is no mention of extremely important topics such as how copyright regarding fan works of existing properties is handled in the country. The section is in dire need of a rewrite which would involve removing a huge swath of what is already there. 2404:2D00:5000:701:B9D2:5B05:FC57:BA04 (talk) 00:07, 22 June 2022 (UTC)Reply