Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gallium scan article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
There certainly should not be two articles on gallium scan and gallium imaging, since they are the same thing. The question is which term is more common. Google gives 5 times more hits for gallium scan, which is the older term. Though gallium imaging is emerging as the newer term of choice, it hasn't yet taken over. Since his is not a hot topic, unless somebody disagrees later (feel free to revert if you have strong feelings, or discuss here with reasons), I'm going to be WP:BOLD and move the cats and other new stuff from the gallium imaging article, and redirect gallium imaging here, to gallium scan. When the newer term gains such acceptance as to be the more common google hit, the titles and redirect can be reversed. SBHarris02:53, 12 December 2008 (UTC)Reply
