Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2358a69cfe0d937

Jump to content

Talk:Gabriel Jacobs

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 10 days ago by ~2026-40514-20 in topic Noah Jacobs dispute

Noah Jacobs

[edit]

There is not any proof through written ancestry or DNA that Noah is the son of Hezekiah. There is also not any proof that Noah and Keziah married or proof that Gabriel Long gave Keziah land in the year 1835. Also the names of Noah's children should not be included in this unsubstantiated article. There is no proof that the land Noah sold to Jane Cumbo was inherited from Ezekiah Jacobs.All unsubstantiated material should be removed. MimiBecca (talk) 17:48, 24 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Noah Jacobs dispute

[edit]

@Jackjd0 @~2026-40514-20 @Kotthu Since there seems to be an argument over if the info about Noah Jacobs is accurate and reliable, please discuss it here instead of starting an edit war. Thank you. SHSR TC 21:51, 19 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! My contention is simply a source should be provided if the user wishes to blank part of the page. They've just linked to a personal user-submissions consumer DNA website page. You might note that the same topic seems to be addressed above by the user MimiBecca. Let me know if you have any thoughts. Kotthu (talk) 21:53, 19 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
The information that was removed was never documented when it was originally placed in the article. The "personal user-submissions consumer DNA website page" as you called it is run by FPOC descendants of the Jacobs' and is used to verify descendency. If it can be used to verify, then it can be used to remove. ~2026-40514-20 (talk) 22:29, 19 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Please read Wikipedia:Reliable sources thoroughly, thank you. It's not a reliable source for Wikipedia. It wouldn't even count as a primary source. Kotthu (talk) 22:50, 19 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Can you explain what reliable source was used for the original information about Noah, his family, and all their ancestry? ~2026-40514-20 (talk) 22:53, 19 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Seems to be primary sources along with an article about a Jacobs gun control case. This article was made in 2019. Maybe @EB Norris1 can comment, since he seems to have written this article. I'll see how much I can look into it later because i'm interested in the history of this family. I'll look into it a bit soon Kotthu (talk) 22:57, 19 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
I am "this family", a direct descendant, and I am a geneaologist. If YDNA proved a link with any Jacobs, I would accept the finding but it has not (has actually disproven the Zacariah/Hezekiah hypothesis). The gun control case information can remain but any information about Noah and his family should be removed.
Another family member (also a geneaologist) tried to have this information removed but was immediately reversed also. It does not appear that the revisions are being taken seriously when they are immediatly reversed. . ~2026-40514-20 (talk) 23:04, 19 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
in this case, it seems like you and the other family member have a conflict of interest- which is relevant to how you should be editing.
(from WP:COIE)
"If you have a close association with the subject of a Wikipedia article, and you wish to edit the article, you are bound by some restrictions. The short version:
- Be transparent about your conflict of interest.[...]
- The practice of editing or creating articles about yourself, your family or friends, your organization, your clients, your employers, or your competitors is strongly discouraged.
- Post suggestions and sources on the article's talk page, or in a draft.
- Get neutral, uninvolved, disinterested editors to review your suggestions. Respect the volunteer community's time; avoid making protracted or repeated requests."
for the actual guidelines, you can go to WP:COI - specifically the section WP:COISELF . the best way to change this page for you would be to follow the guide at WP:COIREQ , requesting what changes you would like made and why. another editor will then review your claims and sources, and add them to the article if it looks good. this process helps us make sure that wikipedia stays as reliable as possible. Jackjd0 (talk) 23:28, 19 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
There is no conflict of interest with the other person who tried to have Noah's info removed. We both want undocumented evidence removed. The onl;y conflict is with the people who keep insisting that Noah is a descendant of Hezekiah/Zacariah. Neither my family member or I believe that and the YDNA tests confirm our belief. The original article wa spublished without any evidence that Noah was descended from Zacariah/Hezekiah. Why was the original author not held to the same standard? ~2026-40514-20 (talk) 02:51, 20 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
As I said before, I'd really recommend you read Wikipedia:Reliable sources Kotthu (talk) 23:44, 19 July 2026 (UTC)Reply