Talk:GW approximation
Add topicLatest comment: 10 months ago by ReyHahn in topic G0W0
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Use GW instead of GWA
[edit]In the community, nobody speaks of "GWA", everyone uses just "GW" or "the GW method" as the main term. I would suggest not using GWA so extensively in this article, but focus on "GW" as the main term, followed by "method" more than "approximation" except where explicitly discussion why this is an approximation. Ipsecog (talk) 23:44, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
- Done.--ReyHahn (talk) 08:33, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
- Excellent! I touched up the History section a bit, no need to call it GW approximation there, GW is enough. Ipsecog (talk) 21:40, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
G0W0
[edit]It would be relevant to expand this article with a discussion of G0W0 Ipsecog (talk) 21:40, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
- You are welcome to write it.--ReyHahn (talk) 06:34, 17 September 2025 (UTC)