Talk:GMT Games
Add topicLatest comment: 10 years ago by 184.166.157.67 in topic Merger proposal
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the GMT Games article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Merger proposal
[edit]Here I Stand (boardgame) does not seem to meet WP:GNG on its own. I propose we merge it's info into the article.- McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 22:25, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
- It does have some independent reception commentary from Hobby Games: The 100 Best, and better than that it won a Charles S. Roberts Award. 65.126.152.254 (talk) 23:19, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, Charles S. Roberts Award is the preeminent wargaming award. That alone should confer notability though nothing is a sure thing. Also won the 2006 Walter Luc Haas Best Simulation. Recommend no merger. -- GreenC 01:58, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
- Doesn't meet the GNG? Maybe hard to find because the primary title search is easy to confuse with the original quote from whence it was derived. Jclemens (talk) 05:18, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Should not merge into this article, which is about the company GMT. Adding discussion of individual games would just overwhelm the article. Or are you proposing just adding the title to the list of titles? I which case I don't really care, other than to say the list of titles itself will quickly become uwieldly and might be better handled by just linking to GMT's homepage — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.166.157.67 (talk) 21:38, 7 September 2015 (UTC)