Talk:GMFU
Add topic | GMFU was nominated as a Music good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (February 1, 2026, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
![WikiProject icon](/everything/wiki/File:WikiProject_Songs_7"_record_on_sheet_music.png){kind=small}
GA review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:GMFU/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: EternalBaile (talk · contribs) 22:26, 22 September 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: MarioSoulTruthFan (talk · contribs) 18:32, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
This article fails one of the six GA criteria, in such an undeniable way.
- Let's begin to take a closer look at the infobox genre, nonexistent. There is no source backing up the release date
- Some references might not be reliable, such as "Our Generation Music"
- It can't address the main aspects of the topic; "Broad in its coverage" some sections don't even exist such as background and the ones that exists are minimal
- On the Commercial performance, it is said the song shipped a million copies, wich is clerly not true, since certifications are based on streaming+sales.
- Why isn't the personnel on the composition section?
- The audio sample, should be in the composition section
- I'm not sure if the sample is complaint with the Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Music samples
- On the personnel section; no engineers, mixing, mastering? I find it hard to believe, once again the information is probably not available.
- The sources in the article have way more info in them that can be extracted to expand this article.
To sum up, the range of coverage is alarming for this article. I'm not sure as it is B-status, at best it could be a start article. I strongly advise you to take a look at other GA and FA articles as there are plenty of them. Please don't nominate this again in this shape. You can't address the big issue within the usual time (7 days), I could even give you a month and it would definitely take longer. You need to do research on the web and any other sources. I believe I have justified myself regarding the quick-fail of this article. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 18:52, 1 February 2026 (UTC)