Talk:GG

Would someone really search "GG" to find these subjects?

It seems that several links in this dab should be removed because they aren't reasonably associated with the "GG" title. Certainly there are a great number of article subjects (and personal names) that could be abbreviated "GG". But it is not the purpose of a disambiguation page to catalog those possibilities. This page exists to redirect people who type "GG" into wikipedia. The criteria for inclusion on this page must be a reasonable expectation that someone would seek an article by typing "GG".

For example, Grey Griffins could be abbreviated GG, and on literature discussion forums, it may very well be. But would someone really search "GG" on wikipedia to find Grey Griffins? Unlikely. The GG abbreviation isn't mentioned anywhere in the Grey Griffins article. Further, Wikipedia is not a dictionary, so demonstrations that GG is synonymous with Grey Griffins are better left to Wiktionary. I propose that these superfluous links be removed. Noca2plus (talk) 23:05, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

I agree. No one would search GG when looking for General Grievous. Metallurgist (talk) 01:35, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Mackerel

@DerpGunKV2: are there truly sources in English that refer to this fish as "GG"? Right now even the term Galunggong doesn't appear on that target article, so it definitely fails MOS:DABMENTION and MOS:DABABBREV. -- Fyrael (talk) 05:14, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 4 December 2022

GG = Good Game 216.158.107.134 (talk) 10:02, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

 Not done. It's already there. ~~lol1VNIO⁠🎌 (I made a mistake? talk to me) 10:23, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Golden Gate Bridge

The only mention I can find of "GG" in the Golden Gate Bridge article is part of a dead link from 2008, so I have removed the Golden Gate Bridge from this disambugation. If I'm wrong, sorry, and feel free to revert. GoldRomean (talk) 16:43, 28 March 2024 (UTC)