Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2229ee59efff54b

Jump to content

Talk:GER Class T19

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Redrose64 in topic Loco numbering/renumbering

Merger suggestion

[edit]

I suggest merging GER Class T19 and GER Class T19 Rebuilt. Biscuittin (talk) 14:27, 26 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

I have merged GER Class T19, GER Class T19 Rebuilt and LNER Class D13, due to the lack of distinct information on all 3, and the fact they are the same locomotives, just mildly changed (excluding the 4-4-0 conversion, but that fits in the T19 article as well). The article itself could do with a lot of streamlining, however. Lukeno94 (talk) 13:53, 23 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

LNER

[edit]

All the T19 2-4-0s had been withdrawn by 1920 and none passed to the LNER so I have removed the LNER navigation box. Instead, I have added an LNER navigation box to LNER Class D13. Biscuittin (talk) 15:12, 26 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Loco numbering/renumbering

[edit]

The "Table of orders and numbers" shows that ##781-790 were "renumbered 770-779 in July 1904". Then the "Table of withdrawals" shows 773 being withdrawn in 1909, 781 (alias 770)and 785 (774) in 1914, 782 (771) in 1919, 787 (776) and 789 (778) in 1920, but 7777 in 1934, 7779 in 1935, 7775 in 1936 and 7772 in 1938.

Either the date of renumbering is wrong or some of the withdrawal dates and or loco numbers are wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Weezerd (talkcontribs) 12:21, 12 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Loco numbers were wrong. Fixed. By 1914, the block 781–790 was occupied by Class M15 2-4-2T built 1904 (order D58). --Redrose64 (talk) 14:02, 12 February 2012 (UTC)Reply