Talk:Fuzzy classification
Add topic | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
While obvious effort has gone into the text, this article is somewhat of a mess including that passages are repeated. I am suspicious that words like consequentially (instead of consequently) indicate that this article is not designed for the easy reading of those who would like to become familiar with these ideas.
It would be very helpful to have a common English-language overview of what fuzzy classification is before we get into the esoteric formal symbols. That is, the plain language overview descriptions may (1) be sufficient for the needs of certain readers and (2) help us to understand the meaning of the formal symbols.
Start a discussion about improving the Fuzzy classification page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Fuzzy classification" page.