Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22e8c1aff9e48fc

Jump to content

Talk:Future Stock

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by DaniloDaysOfOurLives in topic GA review

Title

[edit]

The name of this episode is "Future Stock", not "Futurestock". I checked the DVD for Season 3 and it lists the episode as "Future Stock". -Icweiner

That first guys right, it IS Future Stock and not Futurestock. That second one doesn't even make as much sense as the first, which is an obvious play on Future Shock, which is a Terminator game, a mental disorder in Judge Dredd and mentioned in a bunch of other places.

Who on earth said the title was a play on a "Godzilla the cartoon" episode??? It's obviously based on the 1970 book by Alvin Toffler.Barsoomian (talk) 10:18, 17 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

General

[edit]

When the Planet Express stockholders are shown voting whether to sell the company Dr. Zoidberg is also shown even though he has already sold his stock for a sandwich.

There is no need for this to be stated twice within three lines of each other.

--Would it be useful to add in culture references? Such as That Guy's song he continually sings is a reference to the Men without hats song? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.149.102.86 (talk) 16:11, 6 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Question?

[edit]

How can there be a WikiProject Futurama, trying to make a detailed guide to Futurama, and yet at the same time people are proposing the deletion of episodes for not being "worthy" enough in some way? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tuckerresearch (talkcontribs) 05:15, 17 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Commercial

[edit]

they make a new commercial for planet express when "that guy" is in charge. what is the commercial a reference to? i know ive seen it before but i cant remember. i think its something like IBM or apple. the logo at the end is an obvious rip-off of FedEx though. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.17.110.34 (talk) 17:40, 28 November 2007 (UTC)Reply


It must be from something since there is a very similar campaign clip from a US democrat candidate (Barrack Obama or something) against H. Clinton. I guess both Futurama and this clip are a parody of the same original thing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.63.197.246 (talk) 23:55, 8 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Who does the voice of "That Guy", is it David Herman? Sounds like him to me.

Just wondering, but why is there a comment under Cultural Reference saying "That Guy" is modeled after Tom Cruise from Wall Street when it should be Michael Douglas instead? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.18.177.255 (talk) 22:48, 18 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

You are thinking of a 1984 Macintosh commercial, which is it's self, a parody of the film 1984. 2/4/2008 Zeelog1 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.164.37.128 (talk) 14:39, 4 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

boski and milken?

[edit]

That guy say he was hanging out with Boski and Milken in the 80s... i know who Milken us but who is Boski (sp?)? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.175.83.141 (talk) 05:09, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Ivan Boesky - I tried linking Boesky and Michael Milken in the article, because I think that lots of younger people probably don't remember them, but some jerk keeps reverting on the grounds that it's an "unreferenced" addition. Seriously, what kind of reference are you supposed to have for a super-obvious cultural reference? Yet another reminder of how many Wikipedians totally blow. Adam_sk (talk) 04:07, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

GA review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Future Stock/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Regularrrr0 (talk · contribs) 23:12, 29 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk · contribs) 21:01, 30 March 2025 (UTC)Reply


I was going to review this GA but as the nominator/main recent contributor has been blocked as a sockpuppet I do not think there will be anyone to take on any of the GA changes etc and so I am going to unfortunately close it. If someone else wants to nominate it in the future I will be happy to review it properly :) DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 21:01, 30 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.