Talk:Furuichi Kofun Group
Add topic| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| On 11 January 2026, it was proposed that this article be moved from Furuichi Kofun Cluster to Furuichi Kofun Group. The result of the discussion was moved. |
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Furuichi kofungun. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110719143924/http://www.city.fujiidera.osaka.jp/9,1053,97,141.html to http://www.city.fujiidera.osaka.jp/9,1053,97,141.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:14, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Requested move 11 January 2026
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Moved as an uncontested request with minimal participation. If there is any objection within a reasonable time frame, please ask me to reopen the discussion; if I am not available, please ask at the technical requests page. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 18:34, 24 January 2026 (UTC)
– These two kofun groups are regularly discussed together as the Mozu-Furuichi Kofun Group, however, when seperate, they appear to retain that format when discussed individually as well, therefore I'm proposing moving the two to the same format for consistently.
Unesco uses Mozu-Furuichi Kofun Group for the two as does the official website for the Group and Sakai City (though mixed names for the individual groups). There are also some instances of more scholarly sources using this format. Erynamrod (talk) 19:39, 11 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 18:37, 18 January 2026 (UTC)
- Start-Class Japan-related articles
- Mid-importance Japan-related articles
- WikiProject Japan articles
- Start-Class Archaeology articles
- Mid-importance Archaeology articles
- Start-Class World Heritage Sites articles
- Unknown-importance World Heritage Sites articles
- Start-Class Historic sites articles
- Low-importance Historic sites articles
- WikiProject Historic sites articles
- Start-Class Death articles
- Mid-importance Death articles
