Talk:Funeral home
Add topicLatest comment: 15 years ago by Thus Blogged Anderson in topic Loewen Group
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
History section
[edit]The article would be vastly improved with a section discussing the history of the funeral home. BuddingJournalist 07:40, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Other things this could use
[edit]- Discussion of the rise of the funeral home as an institution
- Discussion of consolidation in the funeral industry
- Pictures of interiors
- Link of some sort to critique of the funeral industry, e.g. The American Way of Death by Jessica Mitford.
- I see this is somewhat addressed in the "see also" section.
Loewen Group
[edit]The statement that the Mississippi verdict against Loewen was found to be unjustified is partisan at best. The verdict was never reversed -- Loewen settled. At the very least, the article should avoid the weaselly passive voice and say *who* allegedly found the result to be in error. --Thus Blogged Anderson (talk) 22:21, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Society and social sciences
- Start-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
- Start-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Start-Class culture articles
- Mid-importance culture articles
- WikiProject Culture articles
- Start-Class Death articles
- Mid-importance Death articles
- Start-Class Cemeteries articles
- High-importance Cemeteries articles
- Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors