Talk:Fuji Broadcasting Center

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because...— I’ve changed the information on the article, please check the article before deletion.—IM3847 (talk) 08:16, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

The wording has been only superficially changed and is still a copyright violation. The new version still presents the same ideas in the same order using almost identical wording. For example "The building's design emphasizes space and openness" becomes "The design of the structure emphasizes openness and space"; "Kajima engineers used the "Mast Column"construction method, which features four steel-frame pillars grouped together" becomes "The "Mast Column"construction method was used which groups four steel-frame pillars." It's the same throughout and is still a copyright violation. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:52, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

I've made sufficient changes and it shows only 1% on copyvios report, please check the article before deletion. --IM3847 (talk) 15:06, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

The percentage shown on the copyvios report doesn't matter at all if the material is not properly paraphrased. Making superficial changes to word order will often trick the bot into thinking there's no problem, when examination by an experienced patroller shows there's still an issue. I have done some further copyvio clean-up and the article is now okay from a copyright point of view. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 16:08, 13 May 2018 (UTC)