Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22211c20f50b179

Jump to content

Talk:Fuck

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 months ago by Bis-Serjetà? in topic "OMGWTF" listed at Redirects for discussion
Former good articleFuck was one of the Language and literature good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 3, 2004Peer reviewReviewed
April 23, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
December 19, 2005Good article nomineeListed
January 28, 2006Good article reassessmentDelisted
March 10, 2021Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Delisted good article

Fugger and "fuckerey"

[edit]

I wonder whether the German term "fuckerey," apparently first used in the early 16th century in reference to Jakob Fugger's extreme profiteering and allegedly resultant mass impoverishment (e.g in Tyrol), might be an explanatory addendum or merely is coincidental? Earlier uses are possible, especially since the Fugger family's latinzed version is "Fucker" (e.g., Fucker advenit dedit XLIII denarios dignus - Tax Code, Augsburg, 1367) and given their Europe-wide reach beginning in the mid to late 14th century (Source: Damals, 7, July 2004, pp. 15-23 and pp. 25-29)

"Fxxk" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect Fxxk has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 April 7 § Fxxk until a consensus is reached. SeaHaircutSoilReplace 21:14, 7 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

The fuck is?

[edit]

do we have fuck is? ~2026-23825-61 (talk) 09:25, 18 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia is not a dictionary

[edit]

This is not an encyclopedia article. In a world where Wikipedia still retains any hope of being taken seriously, it should be deleted. As a reminder: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Eric talk 02:27, 14 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Agree that Wikipedia is not a dictionary, which is why articles about words are more than just their definition. Like this article.
Is there some specific policy at WP:DICT that would preclude the inclusion of this article? If so, let's hear it. Mr. Swordfish (talk) 03:15, 14 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

"OMGWTF" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect OMGWTF has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 May 15 § OMGWTF until a consensus is reached. 𝔅𝔦𝔰-𝔖𝔢𝔯𝔧𝔢𝔱𝔞? 21:25, 15 May 2026 (UTC)Reply