Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a229004beba036cd

Jump to content

Talk:Frontal bone

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Otr500 in topic Images

Untitled

[edit]

Why does the Borders section of the article on the Frontal Bone talk about the squama temporalis? It just doesn't seem right.

The preceding question was left on the WP:MED talk page. --Una Smith 14:49, 4 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

It's a mistake; I have corrected it. Axl (talk) 02:47, 6 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Proposed merge with Ossification of frontal bone

[edit]

I have proposed this merge, between the 'ossification' page and this article, because:

  • There is no need for the information on ossification to be hidden away on a separate article. This means the information is not presented as it could be, and it is needlessly fragmented.
  • It is standard on Anatomy pages, and recommended in WP:MEDMOS#Anatomy, for 'Development' sections to be displayed on the same page.
  • Additionally, this page is small and it would give more context to have the information displayed in a central location, rather than hidden on a separate article.
  • If necessary, the article on ossification could be expanded at a later date.
  • As can be seen, by having two separate articles content is already duplicated and/or displayed on one or either article, rather than displayed in a central place on just one article LT910001 (talk) 07:17, 29 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
 Done

Images

[edit]

The article was saturated with images. I removed all the ones in the article as Wikipedia is "NOT" a textbook or repository for images. Otr500 (talk) 18:15, 27 August 2018 (UTC)Reply