Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2960d84a896284b

Jump to content

Talk:Friedrich Friedrichs

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 16 years ago by Auntieruth55 in topic assessment Germany project comments

Assessment

[edit]

George, this article is looking good for B-Class. However, as a rule, can you:

  • Make your lead a bit more substantial, i.e. a paragraph of a few sentences, giving a brief outline of career, rather than just one sentence to establish notability.
  • Tidy up the citations by avoiding bare URLs - doesn't have to be a template but there are acceptable ways of presenting - and merging identical citations. I'll demo on a couple here, if you could finish off for this article and do for others in future.
  • Further to the citations, with something like Flieger-Album, I realise you can't link to the actual entry like you can with The Aerodrome. However, you need to check if the name of the entry on the 'content' page is different to name you give in the article. I had to go searching for Friedrichs because he wasn't actually listed under that exact name in the contents, he was listed as "Frederick Fritz". Again, I've taken care of it here but pls remember for future (or other unassessed) articles.

Be more than happy to assess this one as B-Class after these things are taken care of. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 23:29, 1 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

assessment Germany project comments

[edit]

I echo Ian's comments above. There are several articles on fighter aces, many of which are very good. You could take a look at those and see how they handle boxes and such. I like your style, though, the informality of it. Don't get too informal, though. :) Auntieruth55 (talk) 23:22, 7 September 2009 (UTC)Reply