Talk:Fridtjof Andersen
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 27 days ago by Launchballer in topic Did you know nomination
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Did you know nomination
[edit]
- ... that the newspaper Indherreds-Posten, founded by J. Bernhard Andersen (pictured) and later edited by his son Fridtjof, shifted its political stance from neutral to Conservative, then to Liberal and ultimately to the Radical People's Party?
- Source: [1]
- ALT1: ... that Fridtjof Andersen (pictured), who took over Indherreds-Posten after his father, wrote so libelous editorials that he was court-martialed?
- ALT2: ... that the newspaper Indherreds-Posten, founded by J. Bernhard Andersen (pictured) and later edited by his son Fridtjof, shifted its political stance from neutral to conservative, then to liberal and ultimately to the radical?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Sir John Fenwick, 3rd Baronet
Created by Arsenikk (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.
Arsenikk (talk) 19:59, 21 August 2026 (UTC).
- I take, will review in the next 72 hours.--Launchballer 21:08, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- Looking at , it appears that these are your second, third, and fourth articles, so no QPQ was actually necessary.--Launchballer 09:48, 22 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Arsenikk: Articles are all fine and Earwig's silent, but the hook requires knowledge of what those political parties all stand for to be interesting, so suggest proposing another angle such as the defamatory editorials.--Launchballer 14:53, 24 August 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review and feedback, @Launchballer:. 1) I have added an alternative hook per your proposal. 2) Could the original hook be rephrased using the lower-case terms conservative, liberal and radical? These particular terms are rather universal, and in my opinion the hooks' interest lays in the shift between political ideologies, more so than the party particularities. Arsenikk (talk) 08:15, 25 August 2026 (UTC)
- Courtesy ping Launchballer. ―Panamitsu (talk) 08:00, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
- Sorry for dropping this. @Arsenikk:, ALT2 is more interesting, but I'm probably going to approve ALT1 as well. Per WP:DYKHOOK, I must ask for quotes from the sources to verify them.--Launchballer 12:37, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
- Courtesy ping Launchballer. ―Panamitsu (talk) 08:00, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review and feedback, @Launchballer:. 1) I have added an alternative hook per your proposal. 2) Could the original hook be rephrased using the lower-case terms conservative, liberal and radical? These particular terms are rather universal, and in my opinion the hooks' interest lays in the shift between political ideologies, more so than the party particularities. Arsenikk (talk) 08:15, 25 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Arsenikk: Articles are all fine and Earwig's silent, but the hook requires knowledge of what those political parties all stand for to be interesting, so suggest proposing another angle such as the defamatory editorials.--Launchballer 14:53, 24 August 2026 (UTC)
- Looking at , it appears that these are your second, third, and fourth articles, so no QPQ was actually necessary.--Launchballer 09:48, 22 August 2026 (UTC)
References
- ↑ Saxvik, Kjell (1986). "Indherreds-Posten og avishuset Andersen". SteinkjerSaga (in Norwegian). 1 (1). Steinkjer: Foreningen Gamle Steinkjer: 17–29.