Talk:FreshMinistries
Add topic | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on FreshMinistries. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110525203523/http://www.aegis.com/news/ads/2004/AD042105.html to http://www.aegis.com/news/ads/2004/AD042105.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:41, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Sources and rewrite needed
[edit]For future edits to this article, here are a few key issues with the article. While there is a lot of content in this article and much available on the internet, almost none of the claims made are sourced, even the most basic information available on the FreshMinistries’ website itself. In addition, while most of the promotional material has been cleaned up already, the initiatives section still reads like an advertisement, and needs to be expanded and rewritten in order to have a more encyclopedic tone. I would recommend splitting the different initiatives into their own sections, as many of them lack relevant information that would improve the article. Help with this article is needed and would be greatly appreciated. Astroflower27 (talk) 16:51, 8 August 2025 (UTC)