Talk:French Defence
Add topicLatest comment: 5 months ago by Dayshade in topic 7.f4 in Classical
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the French Defence article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives (index): 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
7.f4 in Classical
[edit]Anyone have any sources that talk about how this move became the dominant one, or mention it at all? I found a brief mention that seems to be the origin of that sentence as I see the same "Not 7...c5 8.Nb5" thing in this article in the book. 99% sure Steinitz Variation is not a good name for it, though I might be missing something. Looks like he only had one game (early in his career, 1863) with the move. It's extremely rare until the 1910s, but gradually increased to ~90% of games by the present day - practically deserves to be called the Modern Variation. 7.Qd2 does typically transpose, but doesn't have to. Dayshade (talk) 19:36, 28 February 2026 (UTC)