Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Presidents of the United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Presidents of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Presidents of the United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject Presidents of the United StatesTemplate:WikiProject Presidents of the United StatesPresidents of the United States
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (center, color, defense, realize, traveled) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Latest comment: 11 days ago32 comments17 people in discussion
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move reviewafter discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
@Xomegas, I have not seen widespread use of the term to refer to the 250th anniversary. Though I have seen other entities use the same or similar branding, but I also don't know whether they're doing so on their own or if they're affiliated with Freedom250 in some way. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page!23:24, 2 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
And the nominator also pointed out that this is also what the organization itself brands itself as. We can always put a hatnote directing towards America 250 (both the organization and the event). Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page!23:22, 2 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Oppose, to avoid the already existing confusion in the public between Freedom 250 and America 250. The legal term, while long, is far less ambiguous than Freedom 250, and moving the article would give an unnecessary press victory to the organization's administration which has intentionally sought to create that ambiguity. Amyipdev (talk) 02:36, 3 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Support: This is the CommonName, see e.g. . A big point of the controversy is that Freedom 250 is trying to make itself America 250 while it is not. I don't see how moving the article would be a "press victory to the organization's administration" nor why that should be a consideration. Freedom 250 already redirects here anyways, so leaving it here isn't stopping any confusion. In solidarity, Aaron Liu (talk) 02:34, 4 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Support Freedom 250, is clearly the WP:COMMONNAME, a hat note would be great in differentiating the different entities. The current name is not common at all. It’s more WP:PRECISE and WP:CONCISE, Freedom 250. It’s the whole controversy 2x2x2x2x2 (talk) 15:33, 4 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Support This is definitely the WP:COMMONNAME. It seems heavily unlikely that people seeking to learn about this subject matter would be looking for it by full name, rather than by Freedom 250. Moreover, this is a timely requested move, as many people are seeking information on this topic today. (Freedom 250 currently redirects to the anniversary itself, rather than this task force.) PickleG13 (talk) 19:53, 4 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Support: I'd close this as a SNOW keep if I didn't have what I consider a COI but the branding and discussion of this entity is almost exclusively as "Freedom 250". Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 00:02, 5 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
You seriously think readers are looking for the commission when searching for 'Freedom 250'? Yes, it's redirected here, because an editor changed the redirect without discussion. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:54, 5 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
All of the edits to that redirect including your single one were made without discussion. I believe that those searching for Freedom 250 are searching for Freedom 250–branded festivities, which are covered better in this article as opposed to unintuitive locations within a single subsection under "Planning". I don't see arguments to the contrary that Freedom 250 activities shouldn't be covered in this article, so correcting the title and redirect would allow us to centralize our coverage and work towards making the America250 article SummaryStyle. In solidarity, Aaron Liu (talk) 15:26, 5 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
There seems to be some serious confusion here, as Freedom 250 refers to one organization, rather than the general semiquincentennial. Once I am free to do so, I will probably need to undertake a thorough overhaul of all these articles—especially the creation of a specific page for the Great American State Fair. Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 23:56, 5 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
America250 is a redirect to the anniversary because sources refer to it as such: The same does not fly with Freedom 250. That said, I'm fine with making that article titled America250 because the evidence for my first sentence is weaker than I thought. In solidarity, Aaron Liu (talk) 16:08, 5 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Technically speaking (and I can admit I am an expert in this particular subject), America 250 is the sole official non-profit partner of the US Semiquincentennial Commission rather than simply the brand name. There is a meaningful distinction from a legal perspective but it's really questionable if the two constitute a distinct subject. "America 250" would probably be a bad name for that article because it could be mistaken as referring to the American semiquincentennial more generally. "Freedom 250" only refers to the subject of this article and is the primary name used on all branding and in most media coverage. Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 21:12, 5 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.