Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a232f2230fd6a0ea

Jump to content

Talk:Freedom (application)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Proposed update to Freedom article (COI disclosure)

[edit]

Hello editors,

I am disclosing a conflict of interest as I am connected to the company Eighty Percent Solutions, Inc., the developer of the Freedom app. Because of this COI, I will not make direct edits to the article myself.

The current article on Freedom is significantly out of date and does not reflect more recent reliable sources or academic research. I have prepared a draft in my user sandbox, written with the goal of meeting Wikipedia’s neutral point of view and supported by independent, reliable references.

Draft sandbox: User:Toccare/sandbox/Freedom

Key improvements in the draft include:

  • Updated lead summarizing the app’s cross-platform availability and purpose.
  • Expanded sections on academic research, citing peer-reviewed studies (Carnegie Mellon, University of California Irvine, Cardiff University).
  • Media coverage from BBC, The Guardian, The New York Times, Entrepreneur, and other major outlets.
  • Updated infobox reflecting the correct developer, Eighty Percent Solutions, Inc.
  • Clearer structure: Overview, Purpose and Use, Academic Research, Media Coverage, Features.

For context:

  • Current article – very short, mostly based on sources from 2008–2011, with little information on current features or research. It does not mention cross-platform support, academic studies, or recent media coverage.
  • Proposed draft – updated to reflect multi-platform support, incorporates peer-reviewed studies (Carnegie Mellon, UC Irvine, Cardiff University), and summarizes recent coverage in major outlets (BBC, The Guardian, New York Times, Entrepreneur). It provides a more balanced, neutral overview of the software’s purpose, features, and cultural relevance.

I would appreciate if uninvolved editors could review the sandbox draft and, if appropriate, replace the current live article with it.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

~~~~ Toccare (talk) 14:59, 20 August 2025 (UTC)Reply