Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23f57cae8e8c526

Jump to content

Talk:Free People

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Curlyloop19 in topic Advertisement
[edit]

This article STILL reads like an advertisement. I'd like to see some discussion here about some of the controversy surrounding the brand's native american cultural appropriations and the origins of the name "free people" from the commune set of the 60s. Ellyjonez (talk) 09:52, 27 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

This article reads like an advertisement. Jdub2255 (talk) 17:00, 25 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Why does this page not include Judy Wicks' contribution to the founding of this store? Centerone (talk) 05:20, 27 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

I added to this post about Free People's apperance on the social media platform Instagram as it was not mentioned before. Gabikhayie (talk) 01:02, 14 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

I added references most of the article (Curlyloop19 (talk) 00:48, 31 March 2017 (UTC))Reply

Soc314: Wikipedia Critique an Article Assignment

[edit]

Each fact in this article is not appropriately cited. A lot of the information used needs citations. There are many facts that do not have a citation as to where they came from. This is a problem because then you cannot tell if its factual or true information posted. There are many things that need to be verified.

The section where it stated Free People was having negative feedback for their festival line all had sources from magazine or news paper articles. All of the links worked and redirected to the specific article. The way the articles wrote about the controversy are very similar to how it was paraphrased in the article however I don't think it was plagiarism. Hailmaj (talk) 01:31, 28 February 2017 (UTC)Reply