Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23ffe64cf70c125

Jump to content

Talk:Free Brazil Movement

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Coltsfan in topic Facebook

Facebook

[edit]

What's up with this apparently gizmodo article which says facebook removed pages from all branches of Brazilian politics? The google translated version of the article seems pretty clear and uncontroversial to me. "In the list are four regional pages of MBL, three pages of support for presidential candidate Jair Bolsonaro, pages that imitate press vehicles like 'G1 - The News Portal', pages that could be considered of opposition, like 'Feminism, Liberty and Voluntarism' and dozens of others that apparently did not have political content, such as The Formula of Love, Job Channel,Top Animes Forever, Fame, among others." Pelirojopajaro (talk) 10:46, 25 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

The info that is found on this website actually was provided by the movement itself. I tried to find other sources on the matter, that could independently backed this information, but couldn't find any. But, all in all, source says "could be considered", and for some reason it's posted in the article as if it was a fact when the source itself cast doubts about it? WP:STICKTOSOURCE and no original research, please. Even the person who added the info in the first place has recognized it's mistake. Coltsfan (talk) 11:01, 25 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
by "this website" you mean gizmodo? But they link to a list of the pages removed which is on a government website (MPF), not an MBL website. Pelirojopajaro (talk) 11:12, 25 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
I was not questioning what websites were taken down or not, i'm talking about the part that they are "opposition pages" (sic). That's a conclusion that, like i point it out, the source itself questions that. Coltsfan (talk) 11:20, 25 December 2018 (UTC)Reply