Talk:Fram

Requested move 3 October 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. There is consensus that there is no clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC as Framlingham gets more pageviews than Fram the 1982 ship.

Fram (ship) is the consensus new title as 2/3 users agree to it. Someone might think it is ambiguous because there is also MS Fram, but it was convincingly argued that the 1982 ship is the WP:Primarytopic for Fram (ship) (and pageviews supports that assertion). So this name is in accordance with policy. (non-admin closure) VR _talk 13:11, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

---

• Fram (disambiguation) → Fram
• Fram → Fram (ship, 1892)

– No clear primary topic, although the ship gets more views than the band some other uses like Framlingham are higher[]. I'm using the date for the ship because there is also a 2006 ship at MS Fram but if that isn't called just "Fram" then Fram (ship) may be OK but on Commons there is also Commons:Category:Fram (ship, 1899), Commons:Category:Fram (ship, 1901), Commons:Category:Fram (ship, 1909), Commons:Category:Fram (ship, 1985), Commons:Category:Fram ÞH 62 (ship, 1985) and Commons:Category:Fram (ship, 2007) and several images in Commons:Category:Ships named Fram. Google results are mixed as are Images and Books. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:35, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

• Support per nom, although I'd probably prefer Fram (ship) since it's the primary ship with the name.--Ortizesp (talk) 18:56, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
• Support disambiguation per the above; no strong preference on where the ship goes. BD2412 T 02:47, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.