Talk:Fragaria
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fragaria article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Redirect to strawberry again
[edit]It's time to put the redirect back to Strawberry. The strawberry page has improved substantially since the redirect was removed. If there is no objection in the next week, I'll put the redirection to strawberry back into place.Nereocystis 07:07, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Done. --Jerome K. 09:36, 2005 May 11 (UTC)
WikiProject Food and drink Tagging
[edit]This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and carefull attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 18:44, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Wild strawberry
[edit]there is no mention of this variety of the fruit. the term redirects to a disambig page, i will redirect it here.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:40, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
Potential reference
[edit]- Amil-Ruiz, F. et al. ”The Strawberry Plant Defense Mechanism: A Molecular Review”, Plant & Cell Physiology (2011),52(11):1873-1903.
--Ronz (talk) 21:53, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for your opinion and suggestion.
This review is meant for readers who would like to delve deeper into the subject. The review is placed in the “further reading” – section because the Wikipedia guideline for this section read: “… publications that would help interested readers learn more about the article subject. The Further reading section (…) should normally not duplicate the content of the References section” (WP:FURTHER).
The Wikipedia content guideline for “Identifying reliable sources (medicine)” (WP:MEDRS) read: “It is usually best to use reviews and meta-analyses where possible.”
The review in question reflect the latest research (last 10 years) in the field, it is scholarly and peer-reviewed, and it is published in an academic journal. Granateple (talk) 23:15, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
- Centralized discussion at Talk:Cranberry#Moved_from_article:_Review_articles_on_possible_health_benefits. --Ronz (talk) 03:03, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
French Illutration
[edit]Yupp, thats why I came to english wiki. Just to get more of your french useless jibberish... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.251.171.229 (talk) 03:38, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
True berries?
[edit]Wouldn't it make more sense to say that strawberries are not true botanical berries? There is a culinary/common use of "berry" that isn't any less legitimate. This is comparable to tomato being a botanical fruit but not a culinary fruit. 2600:6C40:5800:C4C:3E3D:4531:22FE:3E39 (talk) 12:29, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- I agree. The current phrasing is unnecessarily confusing (although only mildly). Invasive Spices (talk) 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- I agree too, and have made a change. Peter coxhead (talk) 17:24, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Etym
[edit]This derives from the Latin word for strawberries and has nothing whatsoever to do with "fragrant" or "fragrance" (wikt). I left the previous mistake in place, assuming that an editor picked it up from a bad source or that it represents a commonish misconception. If it was simply a single editor's OR mistake, it's fine to remove it entirely. — LlywelynII 11:15, 27 November 2022 (UTC)