Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a25e9b0a5fa54628

Jump to content

Talk:Fowelscombe

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Smalljim in topic Latest revert by Lobsterthermidor

Latest revert by Lobsterthermidor

[edit]

I've undone User:Lobsterthermidor's latest revert because it removed too many beneficial changes without adequate explanation. He should explain here why the changes made to the article since 16 April needed to be reverted.  SMALLJIM  22:46, 8 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

I've also moved the article back to "Fowelscombe" from "Manor of Fowelscombe". The consensus regarding the use of articles entitled "Manor of ..." was that it is intended to stop articles on villages etc from being overwhelmed by the voluminous detail that Lobsterthermidor adds about the descent of the same-named ancient manor. See Talk:The_Grange, Broadhembury#Request for comment made, and other discussions that took place around 2016, which I can't find now(*). Anyway, the details of this house and estate can be merged with the details of its owners without being WP:UNDUE, so the problem does not apply here. Consequently we should follow the reliable sources and use the simple title.  SMALLJIM  23:47, 20 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

(*) Update: The main discussion about splitting manorial descents into their own articles was at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements/Archive 3#Manorial histories, way back in 2013. More recent discussions have emphasised the fact that the content of our articles should broadly reflect the balance of topics found in the body of reliable sources on the topic, per WP:PROPORTION.  SMALLJIM  11:19, 23 September 2020 (UTC)Reply