Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23ed92fec1ef4d4

Jump to content

Talk:Founder CEO

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kaitlynkorich.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:25, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Draft feedback

[edit]

Hi! You did a good job at explaining what is a founder CEO, and including examples as well. I would include some interesting statistics like the majority of founder CEOs either get replaced or have to step down, "54% had replaced founder CEOs" Source. I suggest adding more information since it looks a little sparse, but good job! Salinatam (talk) 22:00, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply


Hi! Interesting topic you've chosen! A few things jump out in terms of getting this ready for mainspace:

  • As illustrated by the numerous, small sections, it's very disjointed... more of a collection of individual facts than an article that one would read from start to finish.
  • The lead section should be an overview of the entire article, and should be 1-4 paragraphs. If someone reads just that lead, they should have a clear idea of all the main topics that the rest of the article covers in more detail.
  • Section titles should not use title case; only capitalize the first word, unless it's a proper noun.
  • The Criticism section doesn't make sense to me.

--Sage (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:36, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply