Talk:Fortescue Cuming
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 6 days ago by Surtsicna in topic Did you know nomination
| This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
| ||||||||
Did you know nomination
[edit]
( )
An engraving of Cuming by Saint-Mémin
- ... that after traveling down the Ohio and Mississippi rivers, Fortescue Cuming (pictured) apparently never returned to his wife in Connecticut?
Created by Alekjds (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 31 past nominations.
Alekjds (talk) 18:12, 29 August 2026 (UTC).
- What's dyk worthy about this? Spousal abandonment used to be pretty common. (t · c) buIdhe 01:35, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
- In my opinion the fact that he went off on a two-year journey and never went home to his wife is striking to a modern reader. Other editors are welcome to weigh in on that point. But I'll add an ALT in case I lose the fight:
- ALT1: ... that Thomas Clark judged Fortescue Cuming (pictured) to be "reasonably sane"? (Source: Thomas D. Clark, "Travelers' Accounts as a Source of Kentucky History", The Filson Club History Quarterly, vol. 14 (1940), p. 212: "His observations are reasonably sane, and the information which he has preserved for the historian is definitely valuable.")
- Alekjds (talk) 05:25, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
The article is fresh and sufficiently long. QPQ is done. Sources are cited. There is quite a bit of close paraphrasing, but it comes from the 1930 Dictionary of American Biography, so I imagine that's not a big problem. I would be more intrigued by the original hook than by ALT1, but I think there is potential in the article for something better still, perhaps something humorous. Surtsicna (talk) 13:46, 27 September 2026 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that Thomas Clark judged Fortescue Cuming (pictured) to be "reasonably sane"?