Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23d70a5998ea0d6

Jump to content

Talk:Fort Hayes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Ɱ in topic Image

Untitled

[edit]

Merge with Fort Hayes Metropolitan Education Center?

Overcome by Events?

[edit]

Paragraph One needs to be updated to reflect whatever finally happened. Paul, in Saudi (talk) 12:05, 25 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

This pages has been vandalized do not trust anything on it see the Fort Hayes Metropolitan Education Center section — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.204.140.72 (talk) 23:00, 31 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Absolute nonsense about "shot tower" being used to make musket balls, let alone cannon balls

[edit]

A "shot tower" is capable --- at best --- of making small lead shot for use in shot guns. An 80m tower can produce shot of no more than 3.8mm diameter, suitable for hunting small game and birds. The Fort Hayes/Columbus Arsenal "shot tower" is nowhere near this tall, and there is absolutely no evidence that it was ever used as a shot tower.

Nor is a shot tower capable of producing cast iron balls, let alone "cannonballs."

Lead spherical "musket balls" were obsolete by 1864 when the alleged "shot tower" was built. The Union Army had no use for them, having adopted rifled weapons using non-spherical projectiles long before 1864. Bullets for Union rifles were cast, not made in shot towers.

Likewise, round "cannonballs" --- either solid or case shot --- were cast.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.178.166.3 (talk) 18:36, 4 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Image

[edit]

-- ɱ (talk) 20:53, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply