Talk:Fort Andross
Add topicLatest comment: 3 years ago by UnidentifiedX in topic GA Review
 | Fort Andross is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive. | ||||||||||||
 | Fort Andross has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
 | Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on June 16, 2023, and August 12, 2025. | ||||||||||||
| Current status: Former featured article candidate, current good article | |||||||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Important Spelling
[edit]- Although Fort Andross was named after Governor Edmund Andros, it is unclear as to why there is an extra
S
on the fort's name. This is not a spelling error. Jake-jakubowski (talk) 04:42, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
- Maine Street in Brunswick is spelled as Maine Street. This also is not a spelling error.
Merge?
[edit]Wanted to start a discussion about the possibility of merging this article with the Fort Andross. The infobox that's currently in the article was taken from the Fort Andross article and much of the information is duplicated with better referencing on the Fort Andross article. Thoughts? Jake-jakubowski (talk) 16:51, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
- If noone has any suggestions after two weeks, I will be bold. Jake-jakubowski (talk) 17:23, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
- Fort George (Brunswick, Maine) is now redirected to this article. Jake-jakubowski (talk) 00:17, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Fort Andross/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: UnidentifiedX (talk · contribs) 11:25, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello! I will be reviewing this article. You can read the history log to see if I have made any improvements to the article. If there are large mistakes that require more attention, you will be notified. You can track the assessments’ progress in the following table:
Notified
[edit]
The nominator has been notified of the ongoing review.
Assessment
[edit]
- Comprehension:
- Verifiability:
- Comprehensiveness:
- Neutrality:
- Stability:
- Illustration:
| Criteria | Notes | Result |
|---|---|---|
| (a) (prose) | After reading the article and making minor corrections, I am happy to pass 1a and 1b. | Pass |
| (b) (MoS) | Pass |
| Criteria | Notes | Result |
|---|---|---|
| (a) (references) | The reviewer has left no comments here | Pass |
| (b) (citations to reliable sources) | The article is well referenced | Pass |
| (c) (original research) | The article does not contain any original research | Pass |
| (d) (copyvio and plagiarism) | You can view the report here | Pass |
| Criteria | Notes | Result |
|---|---|---|
| (a) (major aspects) | Happy to pass both. | Pass |
| (b) (focused) | Pass |
| Notes | Result |
|---|---|
| The article represents viewpoints fairly and without bias. Happy to pass. | Pass |
| Notes | Result |
|---|---|
| There is no ongoing edit war or content dispute. | Pass |
| Criteria | Notes | Result |
|---|---|---|
| (a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales) | The reviewer has left no comments here | Pass |
| (b) (appropriate use with suitable captions) | The reviewer has left no comments here | Pass |
Comments
[edit]Thank you for reviewing the edits I made to your article. I am happy to pass the article based on the 6 GA requirements. Thanks for your patience! — Preceding unsigned comment added by UnidentifiedX (talk • contribs) 14:43, 30 December 2022 (UTC)