Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23f986c2a677089

Jump to content

Talk:Forget-Me-Now

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 months ago by Olliefant in topic GA review
Former featured article candidateForget-Me-Now is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Good articleForget-Me-Now has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 28, 2025Peer reviewNot reviewed
January 4, 2026Good article nomineeListed
February 20, 2026Featured article candidateNot promoted
June 20, 2026Featured article candidateNot promoted
Current status: Former featured article candidate, current good article

Barbara

[edit]

Does anyone know the name of the actress who plays 'Barbara' in the brief flashback of Michael's failed dating attempts? Kisaoda 18:43, February 18 2007 (CST)

Peer review

[edit]

I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to bring it to FA status. I modeled it mainly after other television FAs, along with "The One Where Michael Leaves", an article of mine that was recently promoted to featured status. I believe this article is competent enough to go through a PR before FAC rather than a GAN. All comments in any shape or form are appreciated

Thanks, Crystal Drawers (talk) 03:03, 14 November 2025 (UTC) :)Reply

GA review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Forget-Me-Now/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Crystal Drawers (talk · contribs) 14:19, 28 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Olliefant (talk · contribs) 06:53, 31 December 2025 (UTC)Reply


Lead

[edit]
  • I think almost the entire third paragraph is too trivial for the lead, I'd just include that Bob Loblaw replaced Barry Zuckercorn  Done
  • It's unclear that Bob Loblaw is the new character  Done

Plot

[edit]
  • Under 400 words

Production

[edit]
  • Why are those two images used? There some of the two from the 2010s that would be more accurate to what they looked like in Arrested Development ([File:Henry Winkler in Baltimore.jpg] and [File:Scott Baio on RealTVfilms.jpg])  Done
The two images thing is an aesthetic choice more than anything; I've replaced them with the images you gave, thank you
  • Is there a reason Winkler was replaced? Also note that he later returned  Done (kind of)
I couldn’t find a reason for Winkler’s departure, but I did note that he would return
  • Link New York to the relevant article, also it's unclear weather it means New York state or New York City. If it's the city say "New York City" if not leave it as be and the link should help  Done
  • "Forget-Me-Now" was first released on home video in the United States on August 29, 2006, in the Complete Third Season DVD box set" is included in the section yet information on the airdate is included elsewhere  Done
I've created a Release section that combines this with the viewership information
  • No mention of Bob Eistein guest starring as Larry, a simple "X guest starred as Y" would be fine  Done

Themes and analysis

[edit]
  • Link "cross-dressing"  Done

Reception

[edit]
  • It's "/Film" not "SlashFilm", this is repeated in the references  Done
  • "He notes that the storyline of Michael and Rita doesn't work until the twist-ending of "The Ocean Walker", yet he felt that the episode was salvaged by the other sub-plots." this seemingly contradicts the first half of the review. Also I'd clarify what the twist ending was for context  Done
  • The IGN reference is to a ranking, I'd list the rank it got.  Done

References

[edit]
  • Ref 23 is dead and should be marked as such  Done

Other

[edit]
  • Images have alt text
@Olliefant: Thank you so much for the review, all comments have been addressed. Crystal Drawers 🍌 (wanna talk?) 03:58, 2 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Olliefant: Oh, by the way, I'd just like to note I added 2 more sources since the review (information about it’s airing date and time in Release), I hope this is alright Crystal Drawers 🍌 (wanna talk?) 00:08, 4 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
I didn't find any problems with the sourcing, there was a few MOS:DASH violations that I took care of. No new problems found Olliefant (she/her) 03:25, 4 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.