Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a245dfe2fa0fc77b

Jump to content

Talk:Forbin-class cruiser

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Zawed in topic GA Review
Good articleForbin-class cruiser has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starForbin-class cruiser is part of the Protected cruisers of France series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 13, 2020Good article nomineeListed
October 19, 2021Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Forbin-class cruiser/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 09:13, 29 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

I will review, comments to follow in a few days. Zawed (talk) 09:13, 29 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Lead

[edit]
  • Something seems off here: a fleet program that according with the theories of the Jeune École, which proposed a fleet based on cruisers and torpedo boats to defend France. I think it should be read something like "a fleet program that, in accordance with the theories of the Jeune École, proposed a fleet based on cruisers and torpedo boats to defend France."
    • Must've been distracted when I wrote that - I like your solution

Design

[edit]
  • particularly a result I think you mean "particularly as a result"
    • Good catch

Other stuff

[edit]
  • Image tags looks OK
  • No dupe links
  • Earwig tool doesn't pick up obvious copyvios

Only a couple of minor issues, otherwise looks good for GA. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 10:07, 9 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Zawed. Parsecboy (talk) 19:47, 12 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
Your changes look satisfactory. I consider that this article meets the GA criteria - well written, illustrated with appropriately tagged images, reasonable in coverage and cited to reliable sources. Passing as GA now. Zawed (talk) 08:32, 13 August 2020 (UTC)Reply