Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2309fe78df9d434

Jump to content

Talk:Follo Line/GA3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 16 years ago by Dough4872 in topic GA Review

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: ---Dough4872 00:32, 2 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
Comments:

  1. The sentence "To fully utilize this, and possibly built the rest of the Østfold Line for high speeds, it is necessary to increase capacity through the bottleneck from Oslo to Ski." sounds awkward.
  2. The sentence "Rail line capacity restrains the track to twelve trains per hour, as well freight train operation is hampered during rush hour." needs to be reworded.
  3. Even though this is a future rail line, I assume the article is not currently going through rapid changes.

I am placing the article on hold. ---Dough4872 00:32, 2 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the review. Regarding 3), there is very little happening at the moment; all the important decisions have been made (start time, route, to bypass Vevelstad and Kolbotn), and it will take about eight years until completed. Unless something unusual happens, this article will remain fairly stable the next eight years, with a few amendments to construction progress and adding a few dates. The article about the Østfold Line will have changed a lot more in that time that this article. Arsenikk (talk) 11:56, 2 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
I will pass the article. ---Dough4872 16:36, 2 February 2010 (UTC)Reply