Talk:FlyTech Dragonfly
Add topic | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 | This article was nominated for deletion. Please review prior discussions if you are considering renomination.
|
 | The following reference(s) may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
Untitled
[edit]This article needs improvement. Perhaps photos and more detailed specifications. Will try to obtain some which isn't copyrighted. Jaser 12345 20:46, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
"However, being made of plastic and styrofoam, with plastic, papery wings, It often scratches, rips, or cracks." Uhh, it is not made out of styrofoam. It uses EPP, which is a high-impact foam. From what I've heard, it is VERY durable. I am taking this sentence out. 132.241.3.240 22:44, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
FCC External Links not working
[edit]The FCC filing external links are not working. They come up with an "object not found" error. Someone may want to check up on the links. Javawizard 20:01, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
"Despite its supposedly crash resistant body after repeated use the wings get damaged and will not fly properly" is a completely inappropriate sentence to have in wikipedia unless theres a source attached, and the [citation needed] leads me to believe it has none and is original research and someones opinion. Also, crash resistant doesn't say anything about the normal wear and tear of the wings nor does the word resistant implies immunity to the second law of thermodynamics or crashing.
Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:06, 29 July 2018 (UTC)