Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2490bcbf9731e9f

Jump to content

Talk:Fluoxymesterone

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 13 years ago by 78.23.221.100 in topic Poor choice in bodybuilding?

Untitled

[edit]

Lol, sorry but this whole article needs re-writing and researching thouroughly. "The lack of estrogenic activity makes Halotestin perfect for pre-fight usage" - what kind of content is this for an encyclopedia, better yet it's POV. Absolutely ludacrious! That fat balding bastard from steroid.com is at it again! This is learning resource, in other words FACTS related to the compound itself, and medical use NOT an instructional how-to for steroids in a MMA fight .. get a grip you idiot! And please tell me how compiling a book based on google searchs automatically makes you a steroid guru.

Please Please Please someone edit this stub for correctness of information as well as tone. Sounds like an advertisement for the illegal use of anabolic steroids. This medication is prescribed for males who do not make enough of the hormone.

66.142.195.205 15:43, 24 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Delete and start over

[edit]

I am deleting the entire entry, which is completely inappropriate and violates Wikipedia rules. If there is going to be an entry, it should use legitimate sources and a neutral point of view. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.164.105.216 (talk) 22:02, 19 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Poor choice in bodybuilding?

[edit]

Really? Says who? It can be a good choice it just depends on what you want to achieve. The "poor choice" comment is subjective and doesn't belong on this website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.23.221.100 (talk) 23:37, 17 December 2012 (UTC)Reply