Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22d9895b9d88020

Jump to content

Talk:Fluid coupling

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 years ago by 216.152.18.132 in topic Hydrokinetic?


Vulcan-Sinclair

[edit]

I had always assumed that the Vulcan-Sinclair hydraulic coupling (popular on early British diesel locomotives) was a product of the Vulcan Foundry in England. However, it appears that it was actually A. G. Vulcan in Germany. I don't know enough German to translate the German Wikipedia articles but, if somebody else can, it would be interesting. The relevant articles are . Biscuittin (talk) 18:19, 15 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

the link is in Hermann Föttinger in german wiki.he worked in the shipyard.Wdl1961 (talk) 16:20, 10 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello! I want to shop a fluid hydraulik coupling Type MD 32 and power 24 kW ,1460RPM with capacity 5.2 L I want to know how much are the price Best wishes Mahir

Mahir Alhaydar (talk) 13:48, 29 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Slip - Efficiency

[edit]

"The very best efficiency a fluid coupling can achieve is 94 percent" Where does this 94 percent number comes from??? Shouldn't this be completely dependend on the actual slip, used fluid, construction and size of the coupling, etc. ?? GuntherS (talk) 14:24, 8 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

This is a theoretical limit. Issues like fluid internal friction reduce the actual efficiency down from this figure.
The proof isn't simple, but does deserve inclusion. It might be in Fottinger's patents, or it will be in a decent undergrad-level fluid dynamics textbook. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:00, 8 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hydrokinetic?

[edit]

The device being discussed is formally known as a hydrodynamic coupling. The term “hydraulic coupling” is ambiguous as best, as it doesn’t differentiate between hydrodynamic and hydrostatic.

216.152.18.132 (talk) 23:10, 30 April 2022 (UTC)Reply