Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a256f29d9c8da140

Jump to content

Talk:Flow control valve

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 18 years ago by B. Wolterding in topic Merger proposed (Control valve cavitation)

Merger proposed (Control valve cavitation)

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The result was: Merge as proposed. --B. Wolterding (talk) 13:43, 6 December 2007 (UTC)Reply


I propose to merge the content of Control valve cavitation into here, since the notability of that article has been questioned. Actually I am not sure where to put that piece of information, but I think it would bet fit into the "Flow control valve" article.

Please add your comments below. Proposed as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 14:33, 1 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

In my opinion, the Control valve cavitation article definitely does not merit being a stand-alone article. It should either be deleted completely or merged into Flow control valve as proposed. - mbeychok 17:43, 1 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
A merge sounds fine to me.--Hooperbloob 16:27, 2 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Images are not control valves as per page definition

[edit]

The image gallery contains a lot of valves that do not fall into the definition of control valves, suggest removing these to avoid confusion. Dougsim (talk)