Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23d99b93e4edf63

Jump to content

Talk:Florence Deeks

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Mabzilla in topic Deeks v. Wells

Deeks v. Wells

[edit]

I've deleted the statement in the article that Macmillan U.K. published Wells's Outline in the U.K. Macmillan U.K. had turned down the work when it was offered to them. It was published by Newnes as a magazine partwork (and later in bound form) and by Cassells. It's an important point that the British Macmillan by this time had no apparent financial link with Macmillan U.S. or Macmillan Canada. Deeks's lawyers had intended to pursue the idea that her manuscript had been sent from Toronto to London, to be passed on to Wells, but they would be unlikely to aid rivals, especially in such a manner. I hesitate, at the moment, to add more to the page. Magnusson's very readable Queens Law Journal article should be read by anyone with an interest in the case, and those with a taste for OR for its own sake might find plenty of flaws in McKillop's book by a little detective work of their own.--Mabzilla (talk) 02:03, 22 August 2015 (UTC)Reply