Talk:Flora-2
Add topicLatest comment: 11 years ago by Jarble in topic Why the content warning at the article's top?
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Flora-2 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 29 January 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Why the content warning at the article's top?
[edit]"A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject."
Somebody who actually knows about Flora-2 writes a Wikipedia article about it and list factual information. Shock horror? No, this is good! There are not many people who know Flora-2, I would say.
"It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view."
There is no point of view, the article just lists the historical roots and the features. There is nothing wrong with that.
There is a T101 in your kitchen (talk) 19:34, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
@Someone not using his real name: Can you explain why you added this template to the article? Jarble (talk) 06:59, 23 May 2015 (UTC)