Talk:Flight review

Pilot/aviator

By legacy, Pilot is a disambig page, and the topic of aircraft pilot is found at Aviator. But that topic title is a little hokey, as it makes me think of the early-20th-century ideal of the heroic barnstomer (it has acquired a collection of other topics over time, so it's a bit of a mess). I'm not sure how one could make a fresh start on this web of connections though. David Brooks 01:46, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, I'd finally noticed that editing another article. I'm not sure exactly how to go about disentagling the mess, but I am hoping to fill in an article on pilot-in-command in the near future. McNeight 02:17, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

Requested move 25 November 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Clear consensus to move to Flight review (lowercase). (closed by non-admin page mover) echidnaLives - talk - edits 08:17, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

---

Biennial flight review → Flight Review – This article starts off by immediately stating that Biennial Flight Review is the old name for what is now simply called a Flight Review, based on "§ 61.56 Flight review". So for that reason, I would suggest this page be moved to Flight Review instead and have Biennial Flight Review redirect there, rather than the other way around. DanDawson (talk) 02:49, 25 November 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. ‡ The Night Watch ω (talk) 05:56, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

• Support given the the above and doing some additional searches seeing what recent's recently been used, a smattering of just "biennial", a big chunk of "Fight review, formally called ..." (or the reverse), and a decent chunk of just "flight review". But note, I believe it should be Flight review, lower case "review". Skynxnex (talk) 21:46, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
• Lowercase for "review", please. This is not a proper noun. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 06:34, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
• Change and lowercase to Flight review: The official phrase has changed, the article is not just about the US usage, and there's no need for capitalization. SchreiberBike | ⌨  22:06, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
• Change and lowercase to Flight review: No need to cap before. No need to cap now. Cinderella157 (talk) 23:24, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
• Change and lowercase to Flight review. Even the source the nom quotes uses lower case.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  00:09, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
• Change and lowercase to Flight review as per SMcCandlish~TPW 17:15, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.