Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2211d915cbf2780

Jump to content

Talk:Flash mob

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 years ago by AndyFielding in topic Why so negative?

At least 10 people?

[edit]

Why must a flash mob consist of at least 10 people? This claim is made in the first sentence of the article but I can't find it mentioned in any of the references for that sentence and it seems completely arbitrary. Eggybacon (talk) 22:23, 1 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hipster vs Hippie

[edit]

There was an issue with whom Bill Wasik was purportedly making fun of- it was the hippie subculture (as evidenced by the "love rug" and "commune" wording, as opposed to hipsters, which gained popularity in the late 2000s and early 2010s. 134.126.253.25 (talk) 00:35, 7 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Why so negative?

[edit]

Done safely and responsibly, flash mobs can be delightful. I was present at Disneyland when a "mob" of singer/dancers, posing as park guests, suddenly burst into one of the songs from Mary Poppins to surprise Dick Van Dyke on his 90th birthday. (When they finished their chorus, Dick, with gusto belying his age, rushed down from the café balcony where he was dining and dove into the second verse, and everyone joined in.)
This article has such a generally negative focus, it makes me wonder if it was written by someone who prefers structure and predictability over spontaneity. As an editor, I've known many such people, and that's fine. However, I don't think it's equitable having them write critically on this kind of social phenomenon, simply because it creates a theatrical illusion of spontaneity.
The world can be an overbearingly serious place. We can use a bit of colourful lunacy now and then, IMHO. – AndyFielding (talk) 10:31, 6 February 2024 (UTC)Reply