Talk:Flagstaff
Add topicLatest comment: 1 year ago by Abhiimanyu7 in topic Requested move 3 May 2025
 | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | On 3 May 2025, it was proposed that this article be moved to Flagstaff (disambiguation). The result of the discussion was not moved. |
Requested move 3 May 2025
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) --Warm Regards, Abhimanyu7 talk 09:52, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Flagstaff → Flagstaff (disambiguation) – Flagstaff should be a WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT to Flagstaff, Arizona. Add {{redirect|Flagstaff|other uses|Flagpole|and|Flagpole Magazine|and|Flagstaff (disambiguation)}} to the article as well. 2600:1700:6180:6290:1901:F795:10E:8037 (talk) 23:40, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
- May be more persuasive if nominator provides reasoning or supporting evidence that one sees more usage or long-term significance than the other. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 02:16, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
- Not as an argument one way or another—personally am inclined to agree with Zzyzx11 below—so more as a reference: WikiNav says that for March 2025, there were 372 total incoming views to Flagstaff [the dab]. Out of those, 276 meet the "more than 10 views" anonymity threshold (and out of those 276, 38 are from the article on the Arizona city). Out of 287 outgoing views, 264 go to the Arizona city and 23 to Flagpole. The "Comparison over time" section throws an error:
An error occurred while fetching data for the current title. Try another one
. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 03:46, 4 May 2025 (UTC)- For closer's convenience: oppose. I was hoping nominator would return with further explanation—the nomination statement alone does not address the long-term significance of "flagpole" (per Zzyzx11). I also agree with the procedural issue [that this is an incomplete move request] raised by Zxcvbnm. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 20:15, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
- Not as an argument one way or another—personally am inclined to agree with Zzyzx11 below—so more as a reference: WikiNav says that for March 2025, there were 372 total incoming views to Flagstaff [the dab]. Out of those, 276 meet the "more than 10 views" anonymity threshold (and out of those 276, 38 are from the article on the Arizona city). Out of 287 outgoing views, 264 go to the Arizona city and 23 to Flagpole. The "Comparison over time" section throws an error:
- Oppose. I would rather error on the WP:NOPRIMARY status quo and consider the long-term use of the word "flagstaff" as a synonym for "flagpole". Zzyzx11 (talk) 03:19, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Why? BTW, if you were going to do this, you'd have to move Flagstaff, Arizona to just Flagstaff as well. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 19:31, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose per Zzyzx11. Moscow Mule (talk) 15:18, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose. Definitely not the primary topic. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:48, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose. Flagstaff in the sense of a flagpole has global significance, while the town of Flagstaff, Arizona does not. Tomiĉo (talk) 09:40, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.