Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22563f13bea3f27

Jump to content

Talk:First day of issue

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Do we really need three "fair"-use images to illustrate what first day of issue would look like?--Jusjih 08:48, 7 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Probably not. I can't make up my mind which to lose though! One shows "classic" first-day cancel from the 1950s + cachet, one shows modern pictorial first-day cancel, one shows modern British + coin novelty. The Wright Brothers one is probably least-valuable. Stan 14:51, 7 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
Yes, we do need the images. They don't crowd the text if I reduce their size a little, and they all have their merit. We have rarely regarded 3 pics as too many for an article - Adrian Pingstone 15:32, 7 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
It's not the three-ness, it's the fair-use-ness that's at issue. There's a rule limiting the amount of fair use in an article, mostly to keep movie fans from reproducing the entire movie in its article, one screenshot at a time. (I'm only exaggerating a little!). Turns out I have 1946 FDC showing the same cancel, and it's got no copyrighted artwork, will scan and upload to commons. Stan 15:57, 7 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your replies. As a stamp collector collecting first-day covers, I will try to find covers that may be better in the public domain in the USA. As works published in the USA through 1963 are in the public domain therein if no copyright notice or renewal, I can get some covers scanned and uploaded.--Jusjih 17:14, 8 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Tone

[edit]

I have added a tone-tag to this article. To me parts of it read like a manual (e.q. "This can happen in several ways: ..."), and parts seems to be quite centred on America, while I think it should be a worldwide view. Hope this explains the tagging. --Dirk Beetstra T C 14:23, 15 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Draft

[edit]

Note that there is a Draft article that was created about the same topic with a significant amount of additional info that should be merged with this article. You can find it at Draft:First Day Covers.— InsertCleverPhraseHere (or here) 12:02, 19 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Scope

[edit]

Much of this article is out of scope for First Day of Issue/First Day Cover, and should probably be separated out into one or more places that are more appropriate. Nfgusedautoparts (talk) 18:51, 17 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

1 d

[edit]

What is "1 d"? Is it one pence? Please use common, standard practices. (In general, this article is written as if to make it complicated and difficult to understand.) 136.36.180.215 (talk) 02:25, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

FYI, yes 1d is the common practice but I have added a wikilink to the first instance of 1d in the article linking to Penny (British pre-decimal coin). ww2censor (talk) 10:22, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

intent and philatelic covers?

[edit]

This article currently reads "Philatelic covers are envelope prepared with a stamp(s), addressed and sent through the mail delivery system to create a collectible item." and the article [Philatelic cover] also mentioned intent to create a collectible. I have the following question: if someone walks into a post office and buys a stamp that's just been issued that day and mails a friend a letter with no intent to create a collectible, what is the correct term for the resulting object? According the article as written, it clearly is a first day cover and clearly is not a philatelic cover, but in the Types section of the article, this case is not described... Akb4 (talk) 05:10, 21 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:21, 13 July 2025 (UTC)Reply