Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a238118799c0b1a9

Jump to content

Talk:First circle of hell/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 years ago by GhostRiver in topic GA Review

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 02:30, 1 January 2022 (UTC)Reply


Hello! I'll be taking a look at this article for the January 2022 GAN backlog drive. If you haven't already signed up, please feel free to join in! Although QPQ is not required, if you're feeling generous, I also have a list of GA nominations of my own right here.

Lede

[edit]
  • Link "Christian hell" to Hell in Christianity
  • Link baptism
  • Inconsistent capitalization of Limbo throughout; only bringing up because I've only ever seen it capitalized

Synopsis

[edit]
  • Similar to the lede, pipe hell to Hell in Christianity and heaven to Heaven in Christianity
  • See above re: capitalization; it's all lowercase here despite being capitalized in the lede
  • Similarly, Harrowing of Hell should be capitalized here in the body

Background

[edit]
  • Swap comma for colon after "two distinct theories of limbo" and then swap a semicolon for a comma after "of the Old Testament"
  • "middle ages" "Middle Ages" with the WL

Analysis

[edit]
  • Swap em dashes for commas around as an eternal home to the unbaptised and pagans
  • "being disconnected to" "being disconnected from"
  • "Modern interpretation to" "Modern interpretation of"

References

[edit]
  • Good

General comments

[edit]
  • Images are properly licensed and relevant
  • No stability concerns in the revision history
  • Earwig score looks good at 1.0%

Putting on hold to allow nominator to address comments. Please feel free to ping me with questions, and let me know when you're finished! — GhostRiver 05:39, 4 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for taking a look at this. I believe I have addressed everything raised above, although I opted for an em dash rather than a colon just for consistency. Here are the changes made, let me know if there's anything else you feel needs to be addressed. ᵹʀᴀᴘᴘʟᴇ 14:26, 4 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for making those changes so quickly, and for linking the diff. Everything looks good now, happy to pass! — GhostRiver 16:22, 6 January 2022 (UTC)Reply