Talk:First Women Bank

Fair use rationale for Image:First Women Bank Ltd Pakistan.JPG

Image:First Women Bank Ltd Pakistan.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:06, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://fwbl.com.pk/aboutus.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. TreyGeek (talk) 04:31, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Requested move 20 October 2025

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Per WP:NCCORP and WP:COMMONNAME, the shorter form “First Women Bank” is preferable; the legal suffix “Limited” is not commonly used in most references. (closed by non-admin page mover) --Warm Regards, Abhiimanyu7 talk  17:09, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

---

First Women Bank → First Women Bank LimitedFirst Women Bank Limited – As per naming conventions QINGSHAN XUE (talk) 13:01, 20 October 2025 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). QINGSHAN XUE (talk) 13:01, 20 October 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 23:22, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

• Leaning against Unsure. Which naming convention would that be? Can you please quote the relevant sentences? —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 13:27, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

  I see "First Women Bank" (without "Limited") used by some of the cited sources, although the abbreviation does seem to be FWBL, and some sources use the longer form. WP:CONCISE would seem to favour the shorter name. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 16:55, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

• [Note: I closed the WP:RM/TR due to this discussion having been opened. —Fortuna, imperatrix 13:36, 20 October 2025 (UTC)]

Note: WikiProject Pakistan, WikiProject Business, and WikiProject Companies have been notified of this discussion. —Fortuna, imperatrix 13:36, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

• Oppose. The naming convention for companies is usually not to use the suffix. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:35, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• First Women Bank Limited Privatization.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:06, 29 October 2025 (UTC)